| The broadcast flag
(Only Group A has an online discussion for this lesson.)
The broadcast
flag is a series of bits sent along with a digital television program
identifying it as copyrighted content that may only be manipulated or
redistributed in limited ways.
Content owners say
that it is necessary to prevent unauthorized mass redistribution of
copyrighted works. As is typical with DRM issues, this stance is opposed
by consumer groups and
the electronics
industry.
In late 2003, the Federal Communications Commission ruled that all TV
tuners sold starting July 1, 2005 would have to incorporate technology to
restrict copying. However, the US Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia ruled
that the Commission did not have the authority to require the flag because
their jurisdiction is limited to communications, and the broadcast flag
controls what can be done with a signal after it is broadcast.
Subsequently, content owners began to ask Congress to require the flag.
Should Congress do so? Consider these issues and offer an opinion.
- The electronics industry is evidently reluctant
to incorporate the broadcast flag into all new products, because consumers
prefer devices that can do more. Which, if any, of the uses that would
be prohibited under the broadcast flag, are legal and ethical?
- Would the broadcast flag prevent "time-shifting"--recording a program
and watching it later?
- Content owners say that consumers would benefit if the broadcast flag is
adopted. What is their rationale for saying this?
- Suppose the broadcast flag is not adopted; then how much content will be
kept off of digital TV? From what you've read, do you think this will be
an important loss?
- Is piracy of digital content a major revenue problem for content
producers today? If the broadcast flag is not adopted, will piracy become
a greater problem?
- Another objection against the broadcast flag is that it would
prevent HDTV
from being used in distance education. Is this necessarily true, and if
so, how serious would the loss be?
- Another claim is that legislating the broadcast flag
would make open-source
device drivers illegal. Is this necessarily true, and if
so, how serious would the loss be?
>>
|